September 2005 - Posts

Cubs Post Mortem. And I do mean "Mortem".

The season is down to its final days on the North side, as the Cubs wrap up a pretty miserable season with a four game series in Houston.  Since the Bears are on a bye, and the MLB playoffs are starting next week, this is a perfect time to say good-bye to the 2005 Cubs with some post-season analysis.  Not that the Cubs are in the postseason, mind you, but the season's over.  For lack of a better way to analyze the Cubs this year, I'll go position-by-position. 

Right Field - Last year, Sammy Sosa had his third declining year in a row, and the fans started to get pretty rough on him.  After getting beaned by Solomon Torres last April, he was never the same.  He started standing 5 feet away from the plate, and his strikeouts rose while the rest of his stats began to suffer in unison.  He couldn't handle the Wrigley boos and the frustration, so he walked out on the last day.  The Tribune Company didn't help any by releasing the security tape to prove Sammy lied to the media.  It was the last straw for the Cubs faithful, and they booed his image at the Fan Convention.  Cubs fans just couldn't put up with the Prima Dona behavior from a fading superstar.  Hendry was forced to trade him for 50 cents on the dollar (Jerry Hairston Jr. and a few marginal prospects.)  Well, it turned out the Cubs got the better end of that baseball-wise.  Most figured that Sammy would still be a solid, if overpaid player.  He wasn't even as good as Hairston as he hit .220 with only 14 HRs.  Pretty sad, actually.  I still have pictures of Sammy and his historic 1998 season plastered on my wall, and he was a fan favorite for a long time. 

To replace Sammy in Right, the Cubs signed Jeromy Burnitz.  Lots of stat-oriented Cubs fans were irate at the signing, but I was ok with it.  He did about what I expected from him.  .258/.323/.439 with 24 HRs and 87.  Solid defense, too.  Right around league average for a Right fielder, if not slightly below.  Compared to Left Field, he was a rock.  I don't advocate resigning him for next year, but he was a decent one year stopgap. 

Center Field - Wow, did Corey Patterson stink up the joint.  Willie Mays Hayes.  Run like Mays, hit like shit.  I knew Corey had a long swing and was undisciplined, but I never would have expected him to fall so low.  Last year he hit .266 with a .320 OBP and 24 HRs, along with some rather excellent defense.  Turning 25 this year, I was hoping for a modest upgrade at the very least.  Instead, he simply fell apart and his average dipped to .218 with only 13 HRs and a rather pathetic 33 RBIs.  And his defense has become incredibly shoddy, as he's continued to miss cutoff men, misplay flies, and generally have a confused look about him.  He's lost.  Aside from a few months here and there, and a near all-star caliber first half of 2003, he simply has not lived up to his potential.  I think its time to cut the cord.  Trade him for anyone with a pulse.  He's passed what I like to call the “Farnsworth” point, aka the point of no return.  I don't care if he realizes his potential on another team, I just don't think its going to happen here and I want him gone. 

Left Field - Left Field was nearly as bad as Center Field this year.  Todd Hollandsworth proved that he was an excellent 4th Outfielder in his 107 Games on the North side.  He was among the worst regulars all season till the Cubs mercifully traded him to Atlanta in late August.  He never should have been playing every day.  He hasn't been a full-time starter since 1996, what on earth would make Dusty think he's an every day player?  Holly's graying mullet, thats what.  Dusty admitted that he thinks players primes are 32-36.  Sure, Dusty.  Jason Dubois, a 25 year old moose with tremendous power and poor strikezone judgment got to platoon with Holly for a while.  Every fly ball was an adventure with that kid, though, so power-be-damned he got traded to Cleveland in July.  I liked Dubois, but he simply had “DH” written all over him.  I wouldn't be surprised if he puts up a .290/35 HR season in the near future, but unfortunately he simply isn't suited to wear leather on his non-thowring hand.  Deadline trade acquisition Matt Lawton played one lousy month with the club before they traded him to the Yankees.  He was a good acquisition, but he simply didn't do anything for the Cubs.  Hendry gambled and lost.  I do congratulate him for realizing sunk costs, though, with the deal and dumping him while he could still get something.  Since then, Matt Murton and Jerry Hairston have split time, with Murton finally getting regular playing time after Hairston's late season injury.  I really like Murton.  I don't want to say he was a throw-in on the Nomar deal last year, but he was a throw-in.  After an excellent season at AA, the Cubs jerked him back and forth to the majors a few times despite the fact that he a) was hitting .350, and b) was better than all five of the Cubs other OFs.  Whatever.  Dusty doesn't like kids.  Murton, with the red hair and freckles is a spitting image of Opie on the Andy Griffith show, aka Richie Cunningham.  Ain't no kiddies starting on Dusty's team.  Not when Jose Macias has a pulse.  I really hope Murton gets a legitimate chance to win one of the corner outfield spots next year, but with Baker, you never know.

Third Base - Aramis Ramirez is a truly great hitter.  In 123 games, he hit .302/.358/.568 with 31 HRs and 92 RBIs.  The dude rakes.  His defense is best described as “poor“, he's got recurring groin problems, and he's Franklin the Turtle on the basepaths.  But the guy can hit.  He's not going anywhere.  One of the lesser problems the Cubs had this year is no adequate backup for Ramirez.  When he needed his occasional day off, the only guy around to spell him was Jose F. Macias, who's biggest asset is that he plays multiple positions.  He plays them all poorly, mind you, but at the very least, he plays them.  His biggest problem is his manager.  In what alternate universe is Jose Macias worth 175 plate appearances?  I don't mind if he's the last man off the bench in case of emergency, someone that plays eight positions terribly can be an asset in such circumstances.  But Dusty used him as his primary pinch hitter.  Hendry needs to take this toy away from Dusty this offseason.

Shortstop - Nomar was slated at short, but he tore his groin tendons off the bone back in the third week of the season and was lost until the season was all but over.  Bummer.  The guy's great when he plays, but he simply hasn't played much for the Cubs.  I'm having a hard time convincing myself that he's a viable option for next year.  It would have to be a much smaller base salary with much higher incentives for me to even consider him.  He's just too fra-gee-lay to consider.  The Great Neifi Perez played the bulk of the year at SS for us.  He actually did a credible job.  Now go away.  He's 32 years old, and he's been one of the worst every-day players of the past decade.  The Cubs should quit while they're ahead with Neifi, as they got every last drop of productivity out of him.  Ronny Cedeno is a good looking youngster, as Harry would say, and deserves a legitimate shot next year.  He's excellent on defense, and his hitting in 2005 took a great step forward.  It may be a fluke, but he's worth looking at if the Cubs miss out on Furcal (IMO the only SS worth thinking about this offseason.) 

Second Base - Todd Walker is a good hitter perfectly suited for the #2 hole in any lineup.  He doesn't strike out much, walks a lot, and has decent power for a second-sacker.  So that's why Dusty hit him 6th for 80% of the season.  His only knock is his defense is less than stellar.  He has a good glove, but his range is poor. (or so they say)  If no better options present themselves, I'd be happy with him coming back next year. 

First Base - MV-Lee.  Talk about a career year.  Derrek Lee had one of the best seasons ever, by anyone.  To say it was unexpected is quite the understatement.  If I woke up tomorrow with my head sewn to the carpet, I wouldn't be more surprised than I was by Lee's season.  .339/.422/668 with 46 HRs and 106 RBIs to date.  He was a legitimate triple-crown candidate for a while, and he may have had a real shot had Dusty not castrated him with Corey and Neifi at the top of the lineup so many times.  Oh well. 

Catcher - Michael Barrett hits well, but his defense is lacking.  Actually, his defense looks ok to my eyes, and he throws out a fair amount of batters for a guy with a good stick.  His problem is he calls a lousy game.  Everyone on the Cubs staff prefers to throw to Henry Blanco.  I read an article comparing the pitchers ERAs with Blanco to their ERAs with Barrett, and it was seriously more than a two-run difference.  Even Barry Bonds at his Balco-best doesn't make a two-run difference in the final score on a daily basis.  I think Catcher is an area where a serious upgrade is needed. 

Starting Pitching - Carlos Zambrano is the staff ace.  He had a fine year.  He had a bit of a rough stretch in June, but other than that he was his dominant self.  He had a lot of no decisions as well, or else his record would look better than the 14-7 that it stands at now.  Mark Prior spent his usual two months or so on the DL, but when he pitched he was effective.  Not as good as his 2003 year by any means, but he pitched well enough to win most times out.  He's had a lot of fluke injuries in his career, and none of them were pitching related so I think he might be able to paste together a full season next year.  Greg Maddux will always have a place on my pitching staff.  No, he's not pitching like a Hall-of-Famer every time out, but he still does a credible job.  Take that plus all the bench advice that every young pitcher on the Cubs raves about, and you've got yourself quite the bargain.  Kerry Wood.  I don't even know where to begin.  Kid K simply isn't reliable.  He's under contract for next year, and I'd love to see him back and in the rotation.  But they need a really good insurance policy with him, because he's practically guaranteed to spend three or four months on the DL.  Jerome Williams has a lot of career wins for a 23 year old.  He's a solid candidate for the fifth spot in the rotation next year.  Glendon Rusch was the savior of the pitching staff in 2004 but had large stretches of ineffectiveness in 2005, mixed in with occasional brilliance.  He wants to start full-time, but I just don't trust him enough to simply hand him the job in spring training.  So he's gone.

Relief Pitching - Latroy Hawkins was miscast as a closer by you-know-who back in April, and he repeatedly blew lead after lead after lead.  His deer-in-headlights act wore extremely thin with the Cubs faithful, and he was shipped away for Jerome Williams and David Aardsma, an excellent score for Jim Hendry.  Hawkins was a Farnsworth-like dump job, and he fleeced Brian Sabean and the Giants for two under 25 pitchers with lots of potential.  Nice move.  Once Hawkins was out of the picture, Ryan Dempster took over as closer.  It was only suggested about seven thousand times between August 2004 and May 2005 by Hendry, the media, and the fans; but Dusty acted as if he invented penicillin with the move.  Nice!  Elsewhere in the pen, Kerry Wood was mighty effective for a few weeks, and would be an excellent candidate for the pen next year.  I'd rather start him, though, as nine million dollars is an awful lot to pay for a setup guy.  If Hendry can pick up a top-notch starter though, I'd make Wood's move to the pen permanent.  Will Ohman, Mike Weurtz, and Roberto Novoa all had some nice stretches and are welcome back in 2006.  Scott Williamson, supposed mid-season savior, was practically worthless.  So was washed up Mike Remlinger.  After a mediocre 2003 and a below-average 2004, old graybeard finally pitched himself out of a job in 2005.  So did Joe Borowski.  It really hurt to see the pained look on Joe's face when he served up that grand slam to Jeter in the Bronx back in June.  He just wasn't fooling anyone, and the Cubs let him go.  Incidentally, he pitched rather well for the D-Rays down the stretch.  Don't be fooled, though.  He was a new pitcher in a new league with low-expectations.  His fastball is deader than a doornail. 

Bench - This was a major problem all year.  The Cubs best bench players were starting most of the time.  Hollandsworth and Hairston were perfect backups/utility men.  But Dusty wasted those pocket aces by trotting them out day after day after day.  Once Nomar got hurt, Neifi was forced to start far too many games himself.  He was a perfect backup, though.  If Dusty didn't love him so much, I'd consider Neifi as a backup for next year, too.  But I just know that's far too tempting for Baker, so we must eliminate that option. 

Manager - By now, you probably are under the impression that I don't like Dusty Baker that much.  Ding! Ding!  Ding!  What do we have for her, Johnny!?   While its true that I'm not enamored with Dusty's lineup decisions and game management skills, I don't think he's the worst manager in the world.  If we fire Baker, who do we get?  I honestly don't know.  Is Joe Torre going to be available?  Bobby Cox?  I doubt it and no freaking way.  I'd like to see them hire the next Earl Weaver, but its not like there's a Manager Store out there where you simply can pick up a young genius to lead the team to glory.  Go ahead and Fire Baker.  I wouldn't be upset in the slightest.  Just don't hire the next Jim Essian. 

General Manager - I think Jim Hendry's done an adequate job.  If you look at all his trades for the team, most of them have worked out in the Cubs favor.  (Some were absolute steals like the deals for Aramis, Lee, and the Todd Hundley purge.)  The Sosa situation handcuffed him last offseason, though, so he gets a one-year pass.  He simply didn't have the time and resources to fill the biggest holes in the lineup.  (LF, RF, and Closer)  Everyone at those positions that signed big contracts last year, in my opinion, were greatly overpaid.  J.D. Drew, Carlos Beltran, Troy Percival, Armando Benitez, Magglio Ordonez.  All of them spent significant time on the DL this year, and all of them are under contract for massive dollars over the next several years.  We dodged a bullet with every one of them.  If Hendry can simply cure his unnatural fascination for crappy middle infielders, I think he has the smarts to build a winning lineup.  So don't let me down this offseason, Mr. Hendry, or I'll be leading the bandwagon next year that calls for your dismissal. 

That about covers the 2005 Cubs.  Once the playoffs are over, I'll take a look at the players available and offer my two cents on what the team should do for 2006.  See you then. 

PS.  Don't forget to root for the White Sox in the playoffs next week.  I'm not a hater of the South Side, and I don't think any self-respecting Chicagoan should be.  I simply root for the Cubs while the Sox play in some other league.  I only root against them when they're actually playing the Cubs.  It'd be nice to see a championship in this city.  We've been draped in loser-dom for far too long. 

Posted by MikeJ
Filed under:

The Letdown

Well, that sucked.  Kyle Orton was intercepted five times as the Bears got whipped by the Bengals today by a score of 24-7.  With four picks in the first half alone, its amazing they went into the break down only 10-zip.  (Thank you, defense.)  Here's some bullet points:

  • Orton's first half was awful but not unexpected for a rookie.  He wasn't that bad in the second half, though.  He never lost his poise, and just kept going at it to finally break through with some nice plays on a scoring drive in the fourth.  I'm glad they had a few nice drives so he has something positive to think about during next week's bye.  I'm also glad Jeff Blake's butt didn't get off the bench.  That wouldn't have accomplished anything.
  • Where was Cedric Benson?  Jones had another nice game, but Benson didn't get a single carry.  Is he not the RB of the future?  What did the Bears give him 16 millions dollars for?  Do they WANT him to go Ricky on us?  This vexes me.  I'm terribly vexed.
  • Thomas Jones' stock has seriously gone up.  He almost looked as good as Cadillac Williams.  Too bad the Bears couldn't get him.  Wait a minute...
  • The Defense was pretty good.  They held Rudi Johnson to 30-something yards until they got winded in the fourth, and Cincy converted only 2 of 14 third downs.  Overall, the Bears gave up only 244 yards of total offense on the day, which ain't bad.  But they got only one sack and forced only one turnover, and that's not nearly enough on a day when the offense coughed it up six times.  Plus, there were a few big plays by Cincy that just killed the Bears. 
  • Doug Brien had better start making his kicks or he's going to find himself on the unemployment line.  He missed a 39 yarder.  Anything less than 40 yards should be automatic, even in crappy weather.  If he thinks this weather is bad, wait till December.  I'm starting to long for the days of Carlos Huerta.
  • I was hoping to see the Bears shove Chad Johnson's checklist up his you-know-what, but that didn't happen.  Instead I had to see him dancing a jig after one touchdown, then doing some calisthenics after another.  Doesn't he know T.O. did sit-ups in the south end zone last year?  Try to be more original next time, buddy.
  • The Vikings aren't rolling over just yet.  Culpepper found a new target, and that's bad news for the Bears.  The good news is Green Bay is still struggling, falling to 0-3.

So now we have two weeks of this sour taste in our mouths before the next game.  Hopefully the team can brush the stink off and get back to Bear football.  Till next time...

Posted by MikeJ
Filed under:

Bungle in the Jungle

The Cincinnati Bengals come to town Sunday for a showdown with the Bears a Soldier Field.  This will be a good test for the Bears as the Bengals are a good up-and-coming team.  They've got a good offense, an efficient defense, and an excellent coaching staff.  I can't believe I just said all that about the Cincinnati Bungles, perennial doormats.  Their losing ways appear to be but a memory, as they've finally found the right combination for success.  On offense, they've got USC golden boy Carson Palmer throwing to flashy pro-bowler Chad Johnson, along with a really good looking number two man in T.J. Houshmandzadeh.  Rudi Johnson isn't quite as good as Corey Dillon was for them, but he's getting the job done.  After two weeks, they have the #2 ranked offense, and #7 ranked defense.  Looking closer at the numbers, it looks like they've given up a fair number of passing yards but they've been able to keep the points off the board.  Daunte Culpepper and his five interceptions are to thank for that. 

As for the Bears, I'm worried about a letdown.  When a team dominates so thoroughly, they often lose a little focus and tend to get full of themselves.  Hopefully Lovie Smith will keep them focused and hungry.  They haven't won anything yet!  Did I mention how great last Sunday was?  One thing that's really sticking with me is the play of Muhsin Muhammed.  He's just awesome, and I honestly believe the team would be nowhere without him.  He's so good at getting open and making plays, despite the double-teams, that I'm thinking he would have made even last year's QBs look good.  He's earned every penny the Bears are paying him.  Elsewhere on offense, Thomas Jones made his bid to stay in the starting lineup with Sunday's breakout performance, but I'm still looking forward to seeing a lot more of Cedric Benson.  Cedric's yards-per-carry (3.1) wasn't nearly as impressive as Jones' (7.1) was, but his performance was under different circumstances.  Every single snap that Benson was in the game, he got the handoff.  If it was a passing down, Jones would come right back in.  In addition, most of Benson's carries were in the fourth quarter, when the outcome of the game was no longer in question.  The Bears offense was clearly doing nothing more running out the clock with rushing plays.  He might as well have been wearing a target on his back.  Despite all that, he still managed to break free for two nice runs.  I want to see more of Benson in the 2nd quarter, and on passing plays.  Hopefully they can work him in more this week. 

On Defense, Urlacher has been great.  Actually, the whole unit's been great, but I thought I'd single out Urlacher seeing as he got so much crap last year for being overrated.  Keep it up, Mr. Face-of-the-franchise.  Another note on defense, Pro Football Weekly reported that Tommie Harris has had a banged up ankle but the Bears having been hush-hush about it.  He hasn't made the injury report yet, but that rumor looks legit from here.  He's been really quiet the first two games.  Hopefully he'll get healthy and start making plays, as they need him to be good.  (On a side note, which hall-of-famer's spirit has possessed the body of Ian Scott?  He was a wrecking ball the other day.) 

Finally, a prediction for this week.  I suspect the Bengals will try to run more than the Lions did, and duplicate Washington's ground success in week one.  This should set up the long pass to their talented receivers.  If the Bears front seven can stop the run, I trust their secondary will make enough plays to keep the Bears in the game.  On offense, we need another repeat of last week.  No mistakes from Orton, and a solid running game that makes up 60% of the plays.  If they can do this, and win the turnover battle, I see the Bears 24, Bengals 17.

Posted by MikeJ
Filed under:

Beautiful

It was a beautiful day today.  A beautiful day to be a Bears fan.  I don't know how long it will last, we might lose next week by 45.  But today was a great day.  Here's the low down.

The defense was awesome.  Five interceptions, one of which was returned for a TD.  Constant pressure on Harrington.  The Lions only managed 29 yards rushing all day.  Just a dominating performance from start to finish.  I like the new kid, Chris Harris.  He made some plays.  The worst news of the day was when Ogunleye appeared to sprain his ankle never to return.  Hopefully its not too serious and he'll be back next week. 

The offense held its own.  Thomas Jones looked great with 139 yards and 2 TDs.  Cedric Benson looked solid.  Kyle Orton...what to say about Orton.  He didn't make a mistake all day.  Well, he had a few bad throws I suppose, but he didn't drop the ball nor throw it to the wrong team.  Thats perfect in my book.  (Bears fans have comically low expectations at QB.  A twenty yard completion gets a standing ovation.)  Orton led the team to first downs when they needed them, and had a nice TD pass to Moose.  We may have lucked into a winner with Orton. 

Special Teams were good, too.  Wade had a nice punt return for a TD that truly was a team effort.  The only downside on Special Teams were Doug Brien missing a 36 yard field goal late in the game.  (He also connected on a 48 yarder while missing yet another 48 yard shot.) 

As for the Lions, Joey Harrington was just plain awful.  Its truly amazing how little he's advanced after three full years in the league.  Orton outperformed him at every level, and he's just a Roethlisberger clone that limited mistakes and made a few plays when needed.  I'm curious to see if Detroit will make a change at QB before next week's game.  He was that bad.   

Everything went the Bears way today.  Hopefully this will carry over into next week's matchup with the Bungles.  Cincy's looking mighty tough this year, and they completely dismantled Culpepper and the Vikings today.  The Packers lost at home today, too, to the Cleveland Browns.  Whats the deal with the NFC Norris division?  Is it me or does everybody have major problems right now?  Last man standing wins the division.  I hope its the boys in Navy and Orange.  Go Bears!

Posted by MikeJ with 2 comment(s)
Filed under:

Belated NFC North Preview

The Bears are playing the Lions this Sunday in their first divisional matchup of the season.  Scanning the non-Chicago teams in the NFC North, I see a lot of question marks.  (Yeah, because the Bears don't have ANY question marks!)  Last week I took a look at the Bears, and here's what I think of the rest of the division.

Minnesota Vikings - Last year the Vikings finished 8-8, with the 6th ranked offense and 26th ranked defense.  They beat the Packers to advance to the divisional round of the playoffs, where they lost to Philadelphia.  Questions...

  • How much will the Vikings miss Randy Moss?  Lots of people are saying that the Vikes are better off without him, but I don't buy it.  (Yes, I realize its easy to say this after last Sunday's disaster.)  I just don't see Nate Burleson coming close to Randy's production.  He looked good as the #2 man, when Moss was getting double- and triple-teamed on the other side of the field.  NFL History is littered with teams failing with former #2 wideouts stepping into the lead role.  (Look at Peerless Price and Alvin Harper for two big examples.) 
  • How much will they miss offensive coordinator Scott Linehan (now in Miami) and center Matt Birk (out for the year)?  Not as much as they'll miss Moss.
  • Is the Vikings defense improved?  Probably, but they certainly didn't look so hot against Cadillac Williams last week. 

Green Bay Packers - Last year the Packers finished 10-6, winning the NFC North.  They had the 5th ranked offense and the 23rd ranked defense.  They lost to the Vikings in the Wild Card round of the playoffs.

  • Have the Packers improved their dreadful defense?  They ranked #23 in defense last year, and their secondary was just brutal.  I didn't see any difference makers join their team, but maybe I missed something.
  • Is this the year that Bret Favre finally craps out?  He's on the downside of his career, but I've learned to never under-estimate (nor talk trash about) Bret Favre.  He hasn't missed a game since I was in High School (1992).  He's burned our team so many times that I quite frankly can't say a negative thing about him without sounding like a jealous fool.
  • Good Bret or Bad Bret, he'll miss Javon Walker. 

Detroit Lions - Last year they finished 6-10, with the 24th ranked offense and 18th ranked defense.  They won a meaningless game against the Bears in week 16, giving them six wins to the Bears five, along with the 10th pick in the draft (leaving number 4 to the Bears). 

  • Is Joey Harrington the worst starting QB in the NFL?  No, but he's pretty bad.  Today, Chris Mortensen at ESPN.com ranked him 30th of the 32 starting QBs in the league.  (Kyle Orton ranked dead last, by the way.  I'm cool with the ranking, given his inexperience and all.  Anyways, back to the Lions!)  Harrington blows.  He's in his fourth year and has already started 45 games.  Yet he's progressed to the point where he's just two notches above a fourth round draft pick with one career game under his belt.  Pathetic.  Lions fans want him out so bad that they were chomping at the bit to have Jeff Garcia start this year.  Garcia messed up their plans, though, with a broken foot in the preseason. 
  • For the third year in a row, they've used their number one draft pick on a “franchise” WR.  Yeah, its the receiver's fault.  Joey just needs a receiver and he'll be good!  They also picked up a decent TE (Marcus Pollard) this offseason.  So thats four good options to throw to, along with a nice looking runner in Kevin Jones.  If Harrington fails again, they'll bookend their three WRs with another franchise QB. 

So what are we looking at in the NFC North?  The Vikings will repeat last year's record of 8-8, but this year it will be enough to win the division.  Mike Tice won't be winning any coach-of-the-year awards, but they've still got enough firepower to beat up on the rest of the division.  The Lions will follow at 7-9, thanks largely to their running game and some game-changing plays by Roy Williams.  The Bears are next at 6-10, and remain a year away from contending.  In an upset, the Packers will finish last at 4-12.  This is the year that Favre's luck will finally run out.  One can dream, can't he?

Mind you, this isn't how I hope things will turn out.  I hope the Bears go 15-1 while everyone else goes 2-14.  So there.

As for this Sunday, the Bears are at home and Harrington is still Harrington.  Detroit's defense isn't as good as Washington's defense, and Cedric Benson figures to get more chances to show his stuff.  I'm looking forward to seeing progress from Kyle Orton.  If he can play the whole game this week the way he played in the second half last week (minus a turnover or two), the Bears will surely exceed last week's point total.  On defense, hopefully Azumah will be at full strength this week, and the whole Mike Green fiasco will be sorted out.  If the rest of the guys just play their game and stuff the run, the Bears will win.  Bears 16, Lions 7.

Posted by MikeJ
Filed under:

Bears Release Columbo

The Bears released Jerry Angelo's first Bears draft pick today, 2002 First Rounder Marc Columbo.  Well I guess that closes the book on him, he's officially a bust.  He really never did anything for the Bears.  He played a few games, then got hurt, and missed two years.  He came back late last year, played sparingly, blocked a Field Goal, and thats it.  I heard he was a hard worker; and to come back from the injury he had, he must have been.  Nevertheless, he's still a major bust.  He's now nothing more than the answer to a trivia question. 

Angelo's acquired a handful of good veterans through free agency (Moose, Tait) and trades (Ogunleye), but overall his strategy for winning has been through the draft.  So how did he do?  2002 officially goes down as a bust.  Only Alex Brown (4th round) and Adrian Peterson (6th) remain.  There's a number of contributors remaining from the 2003 draft, but the two first round picks (Michael Haynes and Rex Grossman) have either underachieved (in the case of Haynes) or were too banged up to get on the field (Grossman).  The other guys in that draft include Charles Tillman, Lance Briggs, Ian Scott, Todd Johnson, Bobby Wade, Justin Gage, and Joe Odom.  The first two guys on that list have cornerstone potential while the others have at least contributed a little.  Tommie Harris from 2004 thus far looks like a great pick.  Tank Johnson, Bernard Berrian, and Nate Vasher are still around and contributing, while the rest of that draft is but a memory.  Its obviously too early to evaluate the 2005 draft.  (If at least two of the three Benson, Bradley, and Orton pan out, you would call 2005 a success.)  So what do we got?  One busted draft, one good draft, and a third that still has some promise.    So I guess on the draft front Angelo's not doing a terrible job.  He could be doing better, but I imagine he could be doing worse.  I guess his biggest problem draft-wise is that he hasn't yet drafted a pro-bowler.  (Although it wouldn't surprise me if Tillman, Briggs, or Harris make it some day.)   Now if he could only figure out how to acquire a backup Quarterback....

Posted by MikeJ
Filed under:

Skinned! (how original)

The Bears lost 9-7 today to the Washington Redskins.  I didn't like the outcome very much, but I wasn't left with that sinking feeling that such a loss usually brings.  I actually have hope for this season.  Watching Quinn and Krenzel last year, I was yearning for the likes of Jeff George.  Now?  I'm content with Orton for the time being.  He made a few mistakes, and two of them were huge.  But overall, he did about as well as you could have hoped for a rookie-fourth-round-draft-pick-just-promoted-from-third-string-making-his-first-NFL-start-on-opening-day.  (That's a mouthful.)  Orton's biggest asset right now is his confidence.  He didn't look like some scared little girly-man in the pocket.  He didn't have happy feet, he just stood there and made sharp throws to open receivers.  He made mostly good decisions.  I liked what I saw. 

That said, the two fumbles (one lost) were pretty ugly.  And the interception?  He made a bad read.  Ron Turner's game plan gave new meaning to the word conservative.  We've seriously gone from one extreme to the other with our coordinator's game plans for rookie QBs.  They might want to mix it up a little more next week, as it might have been a bit too predictable.  Thomas Jones simply didn't get the job done.  I liked what I saw from Cedric Benson, but the timing of his first series was certainly questionable.  (Fourth Quarter, down by 2, might not be the best time to experiment.)  But I'm ready for Benson, ready for him to start next week.  We already know what Jones can do.  Lets give the big Texan 25 carries and see if he's for real. 

Before I go any further, I have to bring up the fact that Washington's defense is great.  They ranked 3rd in the NFL last year, and they seem to have picked up where they left off.  The fact that the Bears only managed 7 points was hardly a shocker.  On one particular series, the Bears had three straight false starts, followed by a sack leading to a 3rd-and-38 play.  That was the only time all day that I seriously got pissed off.  The Bears offensive line is too experienced to be making mistakes like that which put the team in such a hole. 

The Bears defense was solid.  They gave up some big plays and a lot of yards, but they held them when it mattered.  Or almost every time it mattered, I should say, because after all they DID lose.  Most of the yardage was given up later in the game, after it was apparent the Bears were losing the time-of-possession war.  If the Bears can establish a running game, the defense will improve.

That's about all there is to say about today's game.  Next up is the Detroit Lions at Soldier Field.  They looked good today dismantling the Packers.  (The Packers, by the way, lost Javon Walker for the year - screwing my fantasy team.)  The Bears defense is better than the Packers, though, so I expect another single-digit nailbiter.  Till next time....

Posted by MikeJ
Filed under:

BearSkin Rug

The Chicago Bears kick off their season this Sunday versus the Washington Redskins.  Most national publications are less than optimistic about the Bears chances this season.  In fact, Sports Illustrated picked them dead last, 32nd out of 32 teams.  Really?  Is this team that bad?  I don't think so, but I can see where they're coming from.  Last year the offense was dead last in virtually every category.  They were so far from the #31 ranking, they might as well have been 45th.  So what have they done to improve the offense?  I'll rank the moves in order of importance.

1)  Fire Terry Shea, Hire Ron Turner.  You can't put this high enough on the list of reasons why the offense will improve.  Shea simply was overmatched.  Ron Turner's NFL experience is a little dated, but he can at least claim to be the architect behind the most proficient offense in team history (1995).  From what I've seen in the preseason, he looks to have simplified everything.  Shea threw too much at his young QBs, and it showed on the football field. 

2)  Sign Muhsin Muhammed, release David Terrell.  Talk about a massive upgrade.  Muhammed's only been in about 15 series in the preseason, but he's already made at least 6 or 7 catches that none of last year's receivers would have made.  An extra catch or two per game, especially when they go for first downs, will help immensely.  He's also been nice to have around in practice, as Peanut Tillman has raved about “going up against the best” every day, and how its improving his game.  There's not a single downside with the acquisition of Moose.

3)  Offensive Line upgrade.  Solid linemen Fred Miller and Robert Garza signed, and Big John Tait moved to Left Tackle (where he should have been in the first place).  Eight-time pro-bowler Ruben Brown is healthy.  Toss these guys in the trenches with perennial pro-bowler Olin Kreutz, and we should see a huge difference in line play.  So long as the starting unit stays reasonably healthy, I don't think its possible for them to not reduce the number of sacks allowed by at least 20.  (NFL-high 66 sacks allowed last season.)

4)  Quarterback stability.  Kyle Orton is not Jonathan Quinn, and he's not Craig Krenzel or Chad Hutchinson either.  Yes he's a rookie, and he's bound to make a plethora of mistakes.  But can he possibly be as bad as any of those other three yahoos?  It sucks that Grossman got hurt, but he was no sure thing himself.  It also wasn't a smart move to come into camp without a solid backup, but that's Jerry Angelo's bed, and he's damn well going to sleep in it.  So we're left with Orton.  Moose's presence alone, along with rookie Mark Bradley, gives Orton a lot better options than last year's sad sacks had.  I'm not expecting a Roethlisberger from Orton, but I'm not expecting a Ryan Leaf either.  If he splits the difference, we can win with him.  Just keep repeating to yourself, “Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl...Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl” and things will be alright.

5)  Cedric Benson.  We got a runner.  If he busts, we still got Thomas Jones, and he's no slouch himself.

As for the defense, last year they ranked 13th in the NFL.  Not bad, really.  Its especially not bad if you consider that last season's craptacular offense generated three-and-outs more than half the time, causing the defense to tire and get sloppy in the fourth quarter.  The best news about the 2005 Bears is, this defense is even better than last year, and here's why:

1)  A full year of experience with Ron Rivera's (and Lovie Smith's)  system.  The players know the playbook from day one.

2)  We're healthy.  Ogunleye is back, and he's been dominant in the preseason with four sacks.  Mike Brown is back.  All he does is make plays.  Urlacher's back.  Last year, 0-7 without him, 5-4 with him.  Overrated, my ass.  The only injury concern at the moment is Jerry Azumah, and he's listed as Probable for week 1. 

3)  So many playmakers.  Tommie Harris, Peanut Tillman, Lance Briggs, Alex Brown...not to mention the other guys I already named.

The starting defense gave up one TD in 32 possessions in the preseason.  That good enough for you?  My only concern is them getting worn out when the offense is struggling.  But if the offense can hold the ball for 25-27 minutes per game, that might be enough.

Special Teams.  We lost McQuarters on punt returns, and our top ST tackler, Cameron Worrell.  But we just picked up a guy from Miami (Ayanbadejo) so I think any loss there will be negligible. 

To wrap up, I think this team is alright.  The defense is great, the offense is still bad but improving.  I'm fairly certain we won't end up with the best record in the league, but I also believe we won't be the worst.  Best case:  10-6.  Worst case:  4-12.  Most likely:  6-10. 

As for Sunday's game, Washington's got a pretty tough defense.  Lavar Arrington is a stud, and Joe Gibbs (with help from our old friend Greg Blache) have them playing good hard-nosed ball.  On offense, however, I see a black hole not unlike our own.  They got a decent runner in Clinton Portis, but their passing game looks pretty awful on paper.  Patrick Ramsey is ok (and admittedly better than anything we can offer up at this time), but he's not exactly Mark Rypien (let alone Joe Thiesman).  Our defense can and will shut them down, so the only way we blow it is if Orton throws too many passes to the wrong-colored jerseys.  He throws 3 picks, and we lose.  I'm going to be optimistic this week, though, and I'll say Bears 13, Redskins 10. 

Posted by MikeJ with 4 comment(s)
Filed under:

Thoughts on a beautiful Labor Day

I echo Perry's plea to help out the people in New Orleans.  I can't even fathom what these people are going through.  All we can do is send a donation, some prayers, and hope for the best.  Sports are so insignificant in the grand scheme of things, and its times like these that serve as a big reminder.  That said, they do serve a purpose.  The provide an excellent means for escape. Just a few minutes to forget about all our country's problems and ease the mind a bit.  If we didn't save some time for leisure, we'd all probably go insane.  I know I would.

So with that, its time for your daily escape.  Here's whats been going on with Windy City sports the past few days.

  • The Bears made their final cuts.  Nothing really shocking, unless you're a Todd McMillon fan.  I briefly scanned the waiver wire, and no Quarterbacks of significance were cut.  There's a few minor names like Matt Mauck (Denver) and Bachelor Jesse Palmer (Giants) available, but nobody with any experience to speak of.  Now its up to Angelo to find out if other teams scraps our better than our third course.  One final note, ex-Bear David Terrell got cut by the Patriots.  His legend continues to grow....
  • The Cubs, hopelessly out of it, are on a mission to reach .500.  Dusty Baker annoys the crap out of me.  The season is over, yet he continues to start Neifi Perez, Jeromy Burnitz, and other proven-to-be-mediocre veterans over young talent like Ronny Cedeno and Matt Murton.  Cedeno and Murton have proven themselves in the minors, and it'd be nice to see if they can play in the bigs to see if they're a legitimate option for next year.  Nope, its more important for Dusty to keep his streak of .500 going.  What a bum.
  • The Bulls re-signed Tyson Chandler to a big contract.  Good for the Bulls and good for Chandler.  Tyson thus far has not lived up to his High School hype, and he's not likely to ever surpass the production of Elton Brand (whom he was traded for).  But he's a good, scrappy, young kid, and he plays some Tenacious D.  He hustles on every play, and he's a difference maker.  If he wasn't the #2 pick in the draft, he'd probably be more of a fan favorite. 

    I suspect the other twin toddler, Eddy Curry, will be next to sign.  He's still got that heart condition and the Bulls are pretty much the only team thats interested.  So he's just going to have to take up the tailpipe and sign for whatever the Bulls are offering.  All health risks to this young man aside, but I think this actually saves the Bulls from making a huge mistake.  They don't have to gaurantee him 70+ million dollars for six plus years, and thus Eddy will never get too satisfied and return to his natural tendency to loaf.  If he stays on one year contracts, it'll be like having a player with Contract-itis A every year.  He had it last year, and was having an excellent year until the condition was found. 
  • The White Sox had a fever, and the only prescription was the Detroit Tigers.  (Take three of these, and call me Monday.)  Its amazing what a sweep will do to ease the minds of your fan base.  Kenny struck out in finding some offense, so the Sox will just have to make do with what they got.  It'll be an uphill journey, so try to stay positive, Sox fans.
  • Northern Illinois University isn't located in Chicago, but its close enough.  As a NIU alum, its my duty to mention that the Huskies put up a decent showing against Michigan this past Saturday.  The final score doesn't tell the whole story, as NIU had four fumbles that led directly to Michigan points.  If they could have just held the ball a little tighter, they might have pulled off the upset.  That would have been monumental for the program.  They get another crack at the Big Ten next week, as they travel to Evanston to take on Northwestern.  Prediction: victory.

Thats it from me, I hope you've enjoyed your day off.  Ciao!

Posted by MikeJ

Bears vs Browns Recap

This was a rather boring game, so I'll make this brief:

  • Orton only played two series.  The first play of the game was a beautiful 47 yard pass to Muhsin Muhammed.  The third was picked off in the end zone.  Those two plays illustrate perfectly what we're in for with a rookie QB this season.  I do admire the kid's confidence, though. 
  • I don't know if this means I'm getting old, but he just doesn't look old enough to be playing pro ball.  He looks he should be serving up Blizzards at the local Dairy Queen.  His facial features remind me of a young Peyton Manning.  If he has half Peyton's arm, he'll be the best QB in Bears history.  (I'm not holding my breath.)
  • It seemed to me that the Browns stacked the line, forcing Orton to air it out.  Thomas Jones couldn't do anything.  Hopefully Benson can get past this in the regular season.
  • Overall, our QB situation is pretty terrible.  This isn't exactly a new development, but tonight reminded how poor we are at the position.  Orton's got some upside to go with his rookie mistakes, but Blake is well past his prime, and Kittner doesn't really deserve a job.  I trust Angelo will scour the waiver wire after final cuts this weekend.  If someone with a pulse is available, Kittner's out.
  • Yes, Kittner did have that nice TD pass to Bradley (who had an off and on day himself), but it looked to me that he just flung it up there with his eyes closed and Bradley caught up with it.
  • Starting Defense: still good.  Backup Defense:  still shaky.

And that's it.  The season starts in ten days, and I'm stoked.  Game on!

Posted by MikeJ
Filed under:

My ESPN story

Perry gave you the setup on the ESPN bait and switch, but he didn't give you the details.  I had a Live Draft scheduled for tonight, and around midnight last night, I got the following email:

From:  "ESPN.com Fantasy Games"
Reply-To:  espnnews@espn.go.com
To:  MikeJ
Subject:  ESPN Fantasy Football Draft Notice
Date:  Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:37:27 -0700

As an ESPN Fantasy Football user, please keep in mind that
the start of the season is rapidly approaching.

According to our records, you are a team owner in one of our
free Customizable Leagues. Based on the overwhelming popularity
and demand for ESPN.com's Live Draft, we need to limit draft
slots to EDGE leagues only.  Please upgrade your league with
the EDGE before your draft date to use ESPN.com's live draft
application.  If you decide not to upgrade your league, it will
automatically be switched to an Autopick draft.

This will give you the necessary time to prepare your team.  We
recommend Pre-Ranking your players at the earliest convenience. 

Good luck and enjoy the fantasy season.

-- ESPN Fantasy Games Commissioner

So they wanted me to pay them $99.95 or else my Live Draft would be converted to an Autopick draft.  This was not advertised anywhere on the site when I signed up for my “free” Fantasy Football.  Listen, I'm not a cheapskate.  I've paid for at least 15 Fantasy teams at ESPN since 1998.  Last year I gave Yahoo a try and discovered they offered damn near the same service for free, and in many cases the product was better.  I just had to pay $10 for live stats if I wanted them, and I happily did (and still saved $20 from the ESPN price ).  This year, I was going to sign up for free Yahoo, but they wanted money in order to get a good draft time.  I was ok with that, but ESPN was advertising Free FFL now, in order to compete with Yahoo.  I signed up, customized a league, invited members, customized draft lists, etc.  Then they pull this shit.  If they told me upfront that I couldn't do a live draft unless I paid them money, I would have been fine with that.  In fact, I probably would have paid them money.  But since they pulled the old bait and switch, I'm done.  The other league members and I have agreed to go back to Yahoo and pay for their league.  I'm not going to give ESPN the smug satisfaction.  Greedy bastards.

Update (9/5/2005):  ESPN responded to my angry letter.  They basically said that they've been working very hard and miraculously new time slots for the live draft have opened up.  They also gave me a free Edge team to play with.  Its an acceptable apology, but unfortunately for them my entire league has signed up and paid for a Yahoo league.  I'll play a season with my free Edge team to evaluate their tools and their service.  If their service and controls are clearly superior to Yahoo, I'd consider switching back for next season.  They still have to clean up their deceptive advertising, but this is a good start at making their customers happy.  Now if I can only get them to remove the “Real Sports” segments from SportsCenter....

Posted by MikeJ
Filed under: