The Mitchell Report came out today and let me be the first to say that it was rather underwhelming. In short, Mitchell found that Major League Baseball has had a big problem with rampant use of performance enhancing drugs over the last 20 years. Shocking! Lots of people were to blame, and not just the players. The horror! Baseball needs to clean up. A novel idea!
He did say that baseball has done a decent job in recent years in reducing steroid usage, but it's still far from perfect. On the other hand, the use of the undetectable HGH has gone up since they started testing for the detectable stuff. Not much of a surprise there, either. The cheaters will always be one step ahead (just like all savvy criminals).
No names on the list were a total surprise, though a few were mild surprises. There were also some surprising omissions, but I'll get to that later. As for the big-name surprises, I'd say Andy Petitte was the most surprising. And maybe guys like Mo Vaughn, Paul Lo Duca and Eric Gagne. Also surprising is the number of no-namers/scrubs that made the list. I mean, if you thought Felix Heredia was a sucky pitcher before, imagine how bad he would have been if he hadn't juiced!
As for the not-at-all surprising names, of course the old standards, Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Gary Scheffield, and Rafael Palmeiro were there. And Roger Clemens of course has been rumored for years with nary a shred of proof, but his name has finally been tarnished. I'm not sure if anyone honestly felt he was clean, but I have to admit it's kind of refreshing seeing this, in my eyes at least, obvious cheater exposed. He was awesome (and clean) in the 80s, starting to fade somewhat in the mid-90s, before a career rejuvenation in the late 90s, followed by his peak seasons while in his 40s in the 2000s. Is it possible to have your best season at age 42? In any case, Clemens is an interesting case for the Hall of Fame. On the surface, he's a slam dunk best-pitcher-of-the-last-50-years type of lock. Seven Cy Young Awards? Sick. No brainer. But if you think about it, if he started using in 1997 as the Mitchell Report proclaims, he may not have legitimately earned four of those Cy Youngs. All of a sudden he's Dwight Gooden. Nothing against Gooden, of course, (as he had some problems of his own) but he's a very marginal HOFer, if at all. Did the roids extend Clemens' career, and his trophy case, by six or seven seasons? We'll never know.
All we know is that he used roids and pitched great. And that he competed against a bunch of other players (some publicized and many unpublicized) that used roids as well. So by that logic, you vote for all worthy players or none at all. So he gets my vote still, if I had one. The only time roids should enter the discussion is with the marginal players. For example, Juan Gonzalez. He won a pair of MVPs and had a nice career, but he's a very borderline case for the Hall. His inclusion in the Mitchell Report should probably keep him out.
A couple of other names surfaced today, before the report came out. Kerry Wood and Mark Prior. Actually, a ton of names were released by CNBC earlier this morning as names that were on the list. Guys like Pujols, Nomar, Damon, Varitek, Pudge, and many more. There were some big-time shockers in that group. But none of those guys actually made it onto the final report. Actually, the biggest omission in the report has got to be Sammy Sosa. Sosa has long been accused of juicing up, and I'm reasonably sure he was a user. I'm not 100% positive, though. Maybe 90%. How can I afford him that 10% chance of cleanliness? Well, obviously he's never been caught. No positive tests. No links to dirty trainers. No buying drugs illegally. No mention in the Mitchell Report, other than the note that he elected to not talk to Mitchell. Really, his record is clean. The only thing going against him is a) mind-boggling stats, and b) a willingness to cheat with a corked bat. So he won't have as much steroid debate surrounding his name when he appears on HOF ballots in 7 years or so.
But back to Prior for a moment. As mentioned above, Wood and Prior were on an early, bogus list of users. I gotta tell ya, that hurt a little. Not a lot, as virtually everyone was suspect, but it did hurt a little to see players I loved prominently mentioned. I was quite relieved when they ended up missing the cut. Prior was in the news already today as the Cubs elected to non-tender him and grant him his walking papers. And so ends the Mark Prior era. You want to talk about sad, at least from a pure Cubs fan standpoint, Mark Prior's demise takes the cake. When he came up, he was awesome. Everyone had visions of a Tom Seaver-like career, with multiple World Series appearances, flashing before their eyes. But then it all fell apart, again and again, with trips to the DL. The demise is just so Cub-like I can hardly stand it. His ultimate release ended up being justified, at least it does if the Cubs really feel he's through as a Major League pitcher. Bruce Levine suggested he won't be back till midseason, and even then it will be unlikely that he'll hit 92 ever again. So my plan of keeping him around at four mil "just in case" was really just a waste of resources. If he does ever come back strong, though, it will hurt twice as much as it does today.
And so it goes. Baseball's dirty, gotta clean it up. And have to do it without Mark Prior. Till next time....